|
Reminiscent of the revolutionary protests
and movements that shook developing countries in the
1960s, these new social actors are situated in the “end-of-history”
(Fukayama 1989) context of formal democracy and neo-liberal
economic adjustment plans. Their organization and mobilization,
however, have excited no comparable academic interest:
in the 1960s, the realization that peasants were playing
major roles in national struggles for liberation from
Vietnam to China paved the way for research analyzing
the “moral economy” of the peasantry (Scott
1978; Watts 1983), the circumstances under which peasants
would rebel (Bates 1981; Paige 1975; Wolf 1969), the
political affinities of rural producers (Shanin 1972),
the relationship between the peasantry and the modern
nation state (Moore Jr. 1967; Skocpol 1979) and more.
Today, the surprising political presence of peasant-based
movements has been remarked upon but not well understood.
Key questions to be considered include: what has given
rise to these different movements? Are there similar
issues across regional context or very different issues
playing out? Who joins these movements and why? What
relationship do these movements and actors have to the
state and market – to democracy and capitalism?
Case Studies and Comparative Projects:
In this section of the seminar, we will analyze the
rise of these new social movements as well as their
relationship to broader national development trajectories.
We will focus on social movements in their particular
localized contexts and as part of an increasingly well-organized
transnational network run through the umbrella movement,
Via Campesina. For comparative purposes, we will focus
on: The Rural Landless Workers’ Movement in Brazil,
The Karnataka Farmers’ Union and the Chipko Movement
in India, The Landless Farmers’ Movement in South
Africa, the Black Farmers’ Association in Tillery,
NC, and Via Campesina in France.
Theme leader:
Dorothy Holland, Cary C. Boshamer Professor of Anthropology,
UNC Chapel Hill
|